Talk:Naming Conventions

From XBRLWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

Hommes (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →

Revision as of 07:44, 12 October 2012

Contents

[edit]

Comments

[edit]

Comment-01

RH: Do we have a limited list of 'owners' that can be prescribed?

[edit]

Comment-02

RH: How do we number the rules uniquely?

[edit]

Comment-03

RH: I would like to emphasize that having reasons for each rule prevents a lot of questions. I.e. The reason for folder names to be lower case is to prevent problems between software running on Unix or Microsoft server.

[edit]

Comment-04

RH: In a picture supplied in document 'eba-dpm-xbrl-mapping' more subfolders are presented than are explained in the text. Maybe DTS authors are free in creating extra layers within the 'dict' and 'releasedate' folders?

[edit]

Comment-05

RH: I do not understand why the dictionary folders are not part of a version or release date. And why it is necessary to have a folder per schema. If there are multiple fam.xsd, met.xsd etcetera there may be a use otherwise a 1:1 has been created.

Retrieved from "http://xbrlwiki.info/index.php?title=Talk:Naming_Conventions"
Personal tools